论文部分内容阅读
1994年12月24日,北京市中级人民法院对轰动中外电脑界的北京王码电脑总公司(以下简称王码公司)诉中国东南技术贸易总公司(以下简称东南公司)“五笔字型”专利侵权案进行公开宣判。法院认为:“五笔字型”第四版在第三版的保护范围之内,使用这项技术的东南公司必须向王码公司支付必要的费用。判决一经宣布不啻巨石入水。由北京市中级人民法院聘请的对本案做技术鉴定的专家组负责人曹又崎女士当庭表示,此判决与专家组意见大相径庭。中关村各大电脑公司纷纷表示声援东南公司。东南公司
On December 24, 1994, Beijing Intermediate People's Court investigated Beijing Wangma Computer Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Wangma Company) and China Southeast Technology & Trade Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “southeast company”) for “Wubi” patent Infringement case for public pronouncement. The court held that the fourth edition of “Wubi” was within the scope of the third edition and that the southeast company that used this technology had to pay Wong Code Company the necessary fees. Once the verdict was announced, no boulders were put into the water. Ms. Cao Inaki, head of the expert group engaged in the technical appraisal of the case, hired by the Intermediate People's Court of Beijing, said in court that the judgment is very different from that of the expert group. Zhongguancun major computer companies have expressed solidarity with southeast company. Southeast Company