论文部分内容阅读
方舟子与崔永元的官司在北京海淀法院开庭,方舟子起诉崔永元索赔32万后,崔永元反诉方舟子索赔67万元。两位当事人均未现身。在法庭上,方舟子律师坚称崔永元是骂战的始作俑者,而自己只是怀着科学的态度对崔提出质疑;而崔永元一方则认为,两人的纠纷源于对转基因食品认识不同。这可能是一场很多人“期待已久”的官司。此前争论双方着急上火矛盾已激化到不打官司不足以下台的地步了,双方的参战者和
Fang and Cui Yongyuan lawsuit in court trial in Beijing Haidian, Fang Yuanzi sued Cui Yongyuan claim 32 million, Cui Yongyuan counterclaim Fang Arbitration claim 670,000 yuan. Neither party appeared. At court, Fang’s lawyer insisted that Cui Yong-yuan was the initiator of the scolding war, and he just questioned Cui with a scientific attitude. On the other hand, Cui Yong-yuan argued that the dispute between the two originated from a different understanding of genetically modified food. This may be a lot of people “long-awaited ” lawsuit. Earlier disputes between the two sides heated up contradictions have intensified to not litigate the case is not enough to step down, the two warring parties and