论文部分内容阅读
一般来看,对于书法的审美“标准”总有这样的理解:即找到一定的美学原理来确立书法美的特质,作为可以遵循的法则来判定优劣。符合它,即是好的书法作品;反之,便不够格。争执日久,就会发现:一旦认定某种法则标准,总会排斥其它,致使见解偏颇;若是大而化之地讲传统,说气息,论格调,往往又漫无边际,成为空谈。本文要换一个角度,从标准的字源本义上进行探讨,这就会跳出当今所惯用的美学范式。
Generally speaking, there is always an understanding about the aesthetic standard of calligraphy: to find a certain aesthetic principle to establish the qualities of calligraphy beauty and to judge the pros and cons as a law that can be followed. Consistent with it, that is, good calligraphy; the other hand, they will not qualify. Dispute over time, you will find: once identified a rule of law, always exclude others, resulting in bias; if the generalization of speaking tradition, say the atmosphere, style, often endless, as empty talk. This article from a different point of view, from the standard source of the word to explore the source, which will jump out of today’s aesthetic paradigm.