论文部分内容阅读
在审理专利侵权案件中,当权利要求的用语存在多种理解时,法院结合说明书解释得出的技术方案应当与发明所要解决的技术问题及取得的预期技术效果相适应。但在我国目前大量的国内授权专利中,发明所提供的技术方案仅仅解决了部分发明目的。在此情况下,法院完全依赖发明目的来解释权利要求应当十分谨慎。在具体案件审理过程中,法院有必要综合考虑各种因素,对于说明书在权利要求解释中的适用进行深入的分析和论证,以作出正确的判断。
In the case of trial of patent infringement, when there are various understandings of the terms required by the right, the technical solutions that the court interprets with the explanation of the manual should be compatible with the technical problems to be solved and the expected technical effects achieved. However, in our country a large number of domestic authorized patents, the invention provides the technical solutions only to solve some of the inventions. Under such circumstances, the court should be very cautious in completely relying on the purpose of invention to interpret the claims. In the process of trial of specific cases, the court has to comprehensively consider various factors and conduct in-depth analysis and demonstration of the application of the specification in the interpretation of claims to make correct judgments.