论文部分内容阅读
毕节师专学报98年2期卷首语称:“本刊‘修辞研究’专栏创办伊始,便得到海内前辈时贤的热情鼓励和支持,惠稿源源不断……辞格研究的来稿最多,这颇能反映一种根深蒂固的修辞观念和研究倾向,辞格非不重要,但我们只选两篇短文发表。其内容也许可以再次提醒我们:立格的标准和辞格的分类问题倘不解决,那么名称的花样翻新,辞格的无限膨胀,以及由此而引起的诸多争议,都不可能使修辞研究,乃至辞格研究走上新的起点。”
The Bijie Teachers’ College reported in 1998 that there is an endless stream of philanthropic motivations and supports from the predecessors of Yin in the beginning of its establishment. Reflecting on a deeply rooted rhetorical idea and research tendency, rhetorical questions are not important, but we only choose to publish two short essays, and their content may remind us again: the standard of rigor and the classification of figures of speech, if not resolved, It is impossible for rhetoric research and even rhetorical research to take a new starting point if the names are refurbished, the infinite expansion of figures of speech and the many controversies caused by them arise.