论文部分内容阅读
刚刚出台的《刑法修正案(八)》将醉酒驾驶机动车的行为规定为危险驾驶罪,旨在以刑事手段更好地为汽车时代人民群众的生命、财产安全提供保护。这一新增罪名在司法实践中遭遇了种种困境,引发了热烈讨论,其中争议最大的莫过于“醉驾”的认定标准和认定方法问题。本文通过对比、借鉴国外治理“醉驾”的做法,提出主、客观相结合的认定标准和方法并进行简要论证,以期抛砖引玉,对解决问题提供一点思路。
The just introduced “Criminal Law Amendment (8)” will be drunk driving a motor vehicle as a dangerous crime, aimed at criminal means to better protect the lives of people in the car era, property safety. This new accusation has encountered various difficulties in judicial practice and triggered heated discussions. The most controversial issue is the recognition of “drunk driving” and the identification of methods. This article compares and draws lessons from foreign management “drunk driving ” approach, proposes the main objective and the objective combination standard and the method and carries on the brief argumentation, with a view to start a discussion, provides a little train of thought to solve the problem.