20世纪90年代以来,一种新型的文学批评形态——酷评逐渐进入人们的视野。但关于“酷评”的界定,目前学术界仍是众说纷纭,没有统一的定论。李建军在《关于“酷评”》一文中谈道,“酷评”的模模糊糊被普遍接受的内涵似乎是指一种锋芒毕露、咄咄逼人、动机不纯、效果不好的批评。他指出,这种倾向是有害的,因为它不仅会误导读者,而且很容易挫伤那些有个性负责任的批评家的自尊心和积极性,不利于形成健康的批评风气。[1]这种看法是很有见地的。笔者认为,酷评是文学批评转型的一种形态。一方 Since the 1990s, a new type of literary criticism - cool comment gradually into people’s horizons. However, on the definition of “cool criticism ”, at present the academic circles still have different opinions and there is no unified conclusion. Li Jianjun said in his article “On Critics” that the vague and universally accepted connotation of “Critics ” seems to be a critique of hard-edged, aggressive, impulsive and ineffective . He pointed out that such a tendency is detrimental because it not only misleads the reader, but also easily discourages self-esteem and enthusiasm of those critics who are personality-oriented and unfavorable to the formation of a healthy critical culture. [1] This view is very insightful. In my opinion, cool comment is a form of literary criticism transformation. One side