论文部分内容阅读
通过详细考察重动句补语的语义指向,把重动句根据语义关系分为三类:描述类、评述类和致使类,其中描述类和评述类中补语指向施事和旁及对象,致使类中补语指向动作和旁及对象,重动句的补语不可以指向受事。这三类重动句中,补语部分和述语部分在语义上的关联度逐渐下降,补语部分表示的“结果义”逐渐增强,转换为“把”字句的可行性逐渐增强。由此可见,重动句与“把”字句并不处于互补分布之中。
By examining the semantic orientation of repetitive sentence complements, the sentences are divided into three categories according to their semantic relations: descriptive class, comment class and induced class, in which the complements in the descriptive class and the commented class point to the objects and objects, Complements refer to actions and objects and objects, replenishment sentences complement can not point to the affair. In the three types of repetitive sentences, the semantic relations between the complement part and the speaker part gradually decrease, and the “result” of the complement part gradually increases. The feasibility of converting “” into “” is gradually enhanced. It can be seen from the above that the sentences of “move” and “move” are not in complementary distribution.