2004年,印度最高法院受理了一起行政不作为诉讼。原告是私人,被告是三个国家部委。诉讼理由是:三个国家部委没有在《欧洲专利公约》规定的异议期内对一项欧洲专利提起无效申请,因而错过了提起异议申请的机会。据印度科学界舆论,争议的专利技术实际上来源于印度传统知识,一旦权 In 2004, the Indian Supreme Court accepted an administrative omission lawsuit. Plaintiff is private, the defendant is the three national ministries. The lawsuit is based on the failure of the three ministries to file an invalid application for a European patent during the objection period stipulated in the European Patent Convention, thereby missing the opportunity to file an opposition. According to the opinion of the Indian scientific community, the controversial patented technology actually derives from Indian traditional knowledge. Once the media