论文部分内容阅读
知识产权本身是合法的垄断权,尽管存在一定的消极后果,但那是国家为实施知识产权制度以推动创新的必要代价。反垄断法是现代国家为弥补民商法调整之不足而自觉地干预市场,以维护自由、公平的竞争秩序和经济活力而制定的。知识产权与反垄断法在促进竞争、推动创新和保护消费者上具有一致性,但二者也存在冲突的可能性和协调的必要性:当知识产权的行使行为超出法律的界限,排除、限制竞争时,反垄断法就应当介入这种行为,并在反垄断审查中将知识产权与其他财产权同等对待。
Intellectual property itself is a legitimate monopoly. Although there are some negative consequences, it is a necessary cost for the state to implement the system of intellectual property to promote innovation. The antitrust law is formulated by the modern countries to make up for the inadequacies of the adjustment of civil and commercial laws and consciously intervene in the market so as to safeguard the free and fair competition and economic vitality. Intellectual property and antitrust laws are consistent in promoting competition, promoting innovation and protecting consumers. However, the two also have the possibility of conflict and the necessity of coordination: when the exercise of intellectual property goes beyond the limits of law, exclusion and restriction In the competition, the antitrust law should intervene in such behavior and treat the intellectual property with other property rights in antitrust review.