论文部分内容阅读
图书馆界已经习惯于把图书馆学的不景气归罪于这个令人“讨嫌”的学科名称了。所谓以机构命名学科者寥寥,所谓以机构命名学科影响学科发展……种种怪论不一而足。我很纳闷:学术不景气怪罪于名称,人不发达不就该迁怒于老子给取的名字了吗?
The library community has become accustomed to blaming the sluggish library science for this “suspicious” subject name. The so-called institutional name of a handful of subjects, the so-called institutions subject influence disciplines ... ... all kinds of strange arguments. I wonder: the academic downturn blame the name of people underdeveloped not angry at the name I give it?