从“权力下乡”到“权力在乡”——滇越边境瑶族村治变迁实证研究

来源 :广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:herirong
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
滇越边境瑶族村治变迁交织着国家送“权力下乡”改造瑶族和瑶族融变并使“权力在乡”的双重过程。国家一体化构建力量打破瑶族传统生活逻辑,逐渐将瑶族乡村转型为法治型的草根民主社会。但在该历程中,瑶民自我发展和维权意识的增强和国家权力代理人富民意识的弱化,使瑶区村治主体间的利益纷争成为现实,阻碍着国家社会主义和谐新农村建设的进程。国家政权建设和乡村社会改造应当回到村民这个主体上,让权力真正下放并让位于乡民,形成乡民主导村治权和国家实施乡民自治权的行为模式,中国的乡村治理才能步入良性理路,并实现富民固边和固边强国的国家意志。 The vicissitudes of the Yao villages along the Yunnan-Vietnam border intertwined with the state’s transfer of “power to the countryside” to transform the dual process of melting Yao and Yao into “power in the township.” The forces of national integration have broken the logic of Yao’s traditional life and gradually transformed Yao villages into a grassroots democratic society ruled by law. However, in the course of this process, the self-development of Yao people and the awareness of their rights protection and the weakening of the state power agents’ concept of enriching the people make the dispute of interests among the village officials in Yao district a reality and the process of building a harmonious socialist new countryside in the country. The construction of state power and rural social reconstruction should return to the villagers as the main body, let the power be decentralized and give way to the villagers, form the behavior mode in which the villagers dominate the village and the state implements the autonomy of the villagers. Only in this way can the rural governance in China Into a virtuous road, and realize the will of the rich people to solidify their borders and solid state their power.
其他文献
在过去三十年中,系统功能语言学和语用学都取得了长足的发展,很多事实表明,尽管这两种理论长期以来缺少沟通,但彼此之间存在不少互补之处。本文将探讨它们在哪些具体的方面可