论文部分内容阅读
共犯具有对正犯的从属性,这是二元区分制理论的立足点。而正犯包括直接正犯与间接正犯,因此,共犯具有对直接正犯或间接正犯的从属性是理所当然的结论。但是,在既存在直接正犯又存在间接正犯即所谓“正犯后的正犯”[1]的场合,共犯究竟是对直接正犯还是间接正犯具有从属性呢?如甲、乙得知B在丙的帮助下准备于特定的夜晚埋伏在A经常散步的偏僻处将A射杀。于是甲教唆A利用B的行为将仇人C杀死,乙顺手把自己的手机给了A,而A产生杀死C的故意后,使用乙的手机给C发了假消息(以C恋人的名义),试图将其引诱至该场所,但C因为临时有事而未能出现在现
The accomplice has the subordinate to the positive offender, which is the foothold of the dual distinction theory. While the principal offender includes both immediate and indirect principal offenders, it is a matter of course that accomplice has a direct dependency on the principal or indirect principal. However, where there are both direct and indirect offenders, so-called “principal offenders who are guilty of being guilty of crimes” [1], is the accomplice subordinate to those who are directly offenders or indirect offenders? Ready to ambush at a particular night to shoot A in remote areas where A often walks. So abetting a use of B’s behavior will be the enemy C to kill, B Shun hand to his cell phone to A, and A to kill after the intention of killing C, the use of mobile phones to send a false message to C (in C lover’s name ), Trying to lure it to the place, but C could not appear in the present because of a temporary incident