论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院“6·28”批复的性质是普通的法律解释,不是宪法解释,最高法院没有行使宪法解释权,在目前的宪法体制下最高法院无宪法解释权。在最高法院司法公信力有待进一步加强的情况下,今后改革的方向也不适宜把宪法解释权归之于最高法院,建议用尽现有制度所许可的空间,在全国人大常委会下设置专门的宪法委员会,行使对法律以外的规范性文件进行合宪性审查职责。同时转变宪法解释的观念,在宪法解释的机构、组成、程序、方式等方面加以完善。
The Supreme People’s Court approved the “June 28” nature as an ordinary legal interpretation. It is not a constitutional interpretation. The Supreme Court did not exercise the power of constitutional interpretation. Under the current constitutional system, the Supreme Court has no power of constitutional interpretation. In the case that the judicial credibility of the Supreme Court needs to be further strengthened, the direction of future reforms is not appropriate to attribute the right of constitutional interpretation to the Supreme Court, and suggests that it should exhaust the space permitted by the existing system and set up a special constitution under the NPC Standing Committee The commission exercises the constitutional review responsibility for normative documents outside the law. At the same time, the concept of constitutional interpretation should be changed, and the constitution, constitution, procedures and methods of constitutional interpretation should be improved.