论文部分内容阅读
点校本《明史》问世前出现的万历首辅申时行的传记,至少有十多种。这些传记对申时行或仅记事迹不予评论,或极力歌颂,或予以肯定但行文平和,或褒贬兼有而以褒为主,或虽以褒为主而批评用语亦有一定的分量。而从问世时代分,则明代问世者大体持表扬歌颂态度,清代问世者则多半褒贬相兼且批评用语有一定的分量。这些传记为点校本《明史》底本即殿本《明史》的申时行传,提供了撰写参考。点校本《明史·申时行传》关于申时行籍贯,以及关于其子申用懋任职经历等记载皆有需加考订之处。现存殿本《明史·申时行传》的清朝明史馆拟稿中,有天一阁藏万斯同《明史稿·申时行传》和旧题万斯同编撰《明史·申时行传》,两者多有区别,前者观点相对陈旧,这当反映出前者问世当早于后者,这一状况值得治史学史者给予充分关注。
There are at least 10 kinds of biographies of Wanli First Aid, which appeared before the publication of “Ming History”. These biographies do not comment on or dwell on merit or praises, or praise, or affirmation, but on the basis of compliments, or praise and derogation, or criticize the term even though it is based on compliment. However, from the advent of the age, the majority of those who came out in the Ming dynasty praised and praised their attitudes, whereas those who came out in the Qing dynasty mostly criticized and derogatory terms and criticized the language in a certain amount. These biographies provide a reference for the writing of the Epics of Epistolary Episodes of the Ming Dynasty, the basis of the point school-based “Ming History”. The school-based “Ming Shi Shi Shi Xing Chuan” on Shen Shi place of origin, as well as his son to apply Mao job experience and other records all need to add textual considerations. In the drafting of the Ming Dynasty History Museum of the Ming dynasty, which contains the essay “The History of the Ming and Shen Dynasties,” there are two editions There are many differences, the former point of view is relatively old, which should reflect the former as early as the latter came out, this situation is worthy of full attention history historians.