傅斯年曾说:史学便是史料学。显而易见,没有史料,史学就成了无源之水。但问题在于,在中学历史教学过程中,相当多的老师将傅斯年先生这句话片面理解为:史学便是史料。一字之差,冯京马凉,谬以千里。就课堂教学而言,目之所及,课件中不仅充斥大量的史料,而且史料运用多似是而非。史料的来源、出处、史料证据的适切性等问题在不经意间被忽视了。史料如何证史?叶小兵认为:“对史事的推理和论证必须依据可靠的史料作为证据,培养 Fu Sinian once said: History is the history of science. Obviously, there is no historical data, historiography has become a passive water. However, the problem is that in the history teaching process in middle schools, quite a few teachers understand this passage by Mr. Fu Sinian one-sided: History is the historical material. The word difference, Feng Jing Ma Liang, absurdly miles. As far as classroom teaching is concerned, as far as we can see, courseware is not only filled with a lot of historical materials, but also historical facts are plausible. The sources of historical materials, their origins, the relevance of historical evidence, etc. were inadvertently ignored. History of how to prove history? Ye Xiaobing that: ”Reasoning and argumentation of the historical facts must be based on reliable historical data as evidence, training