论文部分内容阅读
一前言“中国近代知识转型”是一个庞大的研究工程。欲探讨这个东西方学术交会冲击与裂变的议题,至少得从两个大方向进行,一是西方近代科学式知识如何在中国建构,包括体制与观念;一是传统中国学术在近代如何转变。本人一向致力研究后一议题,一方面想了解传统中国学术是否有一知识体系?一方面则探讨传统学术在近代早期亦即明清以降的变化,并试着梳理出传统学术的分化与开放的可能性。欲探讨传统学术的变化,“经学”——这个担当传统学术中心并和政治极度结合的学术载体毫无疑问是一焦点。本文即以经学为主题,观察它在明清尤其是清代乾嘉以降的变化情形,并解释这种变化的学术意义。欲研究经学,议题与角度极之繁多。
A preface “China's modern knowledge transfer ” is a huge research project. To discuss the impact of the east-west academic impact and fissile issues, at least from two general directions, one is how Western modern scientific knowledge in China to build, including the system and concept; the first is how traditional Chinese scholarship in modern times how to change. I have always devoted myself to the study of the latter issue. On the one hand, I would like to know whether there is a system of knowledge in traditional Chinese academics. On the one hand, I will discuss the changes of traditional scholarship in the early modern era, that is, the decline of the Ming and Qing dynasties. I will try to sort out the possibility of the traditional academic differentiation and opening up Sex. To explore the changes of traditional scholarship, there is no doubt that “the study of Confucian classics” - an academic carrier that functions as a traditional academic center and extremely integrated with politics - undoubtedly focuses. This article is based on the Confucian classics, observing its changes in the Ming and Qing dynasties, especially the Qing and Jia dynasties, and explain the academic significance of this change. For the study of classics, topics and angles are extremely numerous.