论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】案外人对机动车的占有是否能对抗申请执行人,执行机构应当依据最高人民法院《关于适用物权法若干问题的解释(一)》(以下简称《物权法解释》)第6条的规定,审查案外人是否符合以下条件:存在合法的转让关系;已经实际占有执行标的;已经支付相应对价;对未办理登记无过错。执行异议的审查,应当以形式审查为原则,实质审查为例外,对机动车权属的异议审查应当以登记为判断依据。
The purpose of the referee Whether a foreigner can apply for enforcement against the possession of a motor vehicle or not, the implementing agency shall, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the Interpretation I of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Applicable Real Right Law (hereinafter referred to as “Real Right Law Interpretation”) , To examine whether the outsider meets the following conditions: there is a legitimate transfer relationship; has the actual possession of the subject matter; has paid the corresponding consideration; not registered without fault. Examine the implementation of objections, the formal review should be the principle of substantive examination as an exception, the objection to the ownership of motor vehicles should be registered to determine the basis for the record.