2002年的人才交流市场,部分用人单位抛出了“应届毕业生,要求有一年以上工作经验”这样的人才选拔标准。记得当时郁闷的毕业生做过这样一个郁闷的比喻:刚孵出的小鸡,要求它下过蛋,可能吗?怎么理解“一年以上工作经验的应届毕业生”这个矛盾?首先我是这样揣摩用人单位的初衷的:社会和象牙塔大相径庭,用人单位不希望所用人才是过于学生气的;而且员工和学生是不同概念的,用人单位希望所用人才有基本的职业素养;何况,毕业生熟悉单位的工作流程等需要相当长一段时间,用人单位不希望新进人才在这一时期没有给单位带来应有的效益。其次这个“工作经验”的具体所指也不只是狭隘的全职工作经验,而是包括兼职、打工、社会活动、社会工作等多种不同层面的理解。作为正在求职的2003届毕业生,我觉得首先应该承认在学习之余参加各类活动对于大学生来说是大有裨益甚至是必要的。我先后有过自由撰稿人、家教、杂志编辑等兼职经历,现在又刚刚结束三个多月的实习,虽不敢说真正有多少具体的受 Talent exchange market in 2002, some employers threw “graduates, requiring more than a year of work experience,” such a talent selection criteria. I remember depressing graduates had such a depressing metaphor: the newly hatched chickens, asked it to lay eggs, possible? How to understand “more than a year of work experience of the recent graduates ” This contradiction? First of all, I Is to try to figure out the original intention of employers: social and ivory tower is very different, employers do not want to use the personnel is too arrogant; and staff and students are different concepts, employers hope that the personnel used have basic professional qualifications; not to mention graduation Students familiar with the work flow of the unit needs a long period of time, employers do not want new talent in this period did not bring due benefits to the unit. Second, the specific reference to “work experience” is not limited to narrow-minded full-time work experience, but includes various levels of understanding such as part-time employment, social work, and social work. As a 2003 graduate who is looking for a job, I think first of all it should be admitted that it is of great benefit and even necessary for college students to participate in all kinds of activities while studying. I’ve worked part-time as a freelance writer, tutor, and magazine editor, and now I’ve just finished my internship for more than three months. Although I’m not sure how much I really have