如何批评和修正哈贝马斯话语伦理学,构建一种更民主、包容的话语模式是女性主义与哈贝马斯对话的重要目标。塞拉·本哈比在普遍主义和交往理性框架内,以“互逆视角”和“扩展的心胸”为基础,建构了一种“交互普遍主义”的话语模式;艾莉丝·马瑞恩·扬从人的差异性和不可化约性出发,提出“非对称互惠”概念,将对话、理解界定为一个创造性的学习过程;菲奥娜·罗宾逊则从自我的关系性和依赖性出发,对道德对话的条件、方式和目标等问题进行了重新解释。在自我与他者、关怀和公正、普遍与特殊之间,她们各有侧重也各有疏失。 How to criticize and correct Habermas’s discourse ethics and construct a more democratic and inclusive discourse model is an important goal of dialogue between feminism and Habermas. In the framework of universalism and intercourse rationality, Serb Benjabi constructed an “interactive universalism” discourse model based on the “mutual perspective” and the “extended mind”; Ai Starting from the difference and indecisability of people, Liss Marion Yang proposed the concept of “asymmetric reciprocity”, which defined dialogue and understanding as a creative learning process. Fiona Robinson, from the perspective of self-relationship Sex and dependency, reinterpreted the conditions, methods and goals of moral dialogue. In the self and the other, caring and fair, universal and special, they each have their own focus and negligence.