论文部分内容阅读
本文介绍了直接成分分析以及从直接成分分析中产生的“两分法”的起源及其在转换生成语法发展史上的意义,分析了凯恩提出严格两分的动因及内在逻辑。本文指出,从语言的形式复杂性角度来分析,坚持严格两分无法解释自然语言中非上下文无关的现象,因此严格两分无法贯彻到底。同时也指出,由于生成语法理论,尤其是最简方案一直不同意波普尔的证伪主义,而赞同拉卡托斯纲领,即使有直接反例说明严格两分不成立,依然不构成对生成语法的挑战。
This paper introduces the direct component analysis and the origin of “dichotomy ” in the direct component analysis and its significance in the history of the development of conversion grammar, analyzes Kane ’s motive and internal logic of the strict dichotomy. This article points out that from the perspective of the formal complexity of language, insisting that strict dichotomy can not explain non-contextual non-contextual phenomena in natural language can not be strictly implemented in two points. At the same time, it is also pointed out that since grammatical grammar generation, especially Minimalist Program, always disagrees with Popper’s falsificationism and agrees with Lakatos’ program, even if there is direct counterexample that the strict dichotomy is not established, it still does not pose a challenge to grammar .