论文部分内容阅读
曾国藩说过:“但问耕耘,莫问收获”。那在批改作业时,怎么能看到学生的“耕耘”呢?大多数学老师在批改作业时,习惯用“√”“×”来评判正误,或采用百分制量分。这两种方法在判断解题正误,评价学生学习成绩,比较学习差异方面有一定的作用。但长期使用未免显得有些单调乏味,而且不能全面评价一个学生的基本素质、学习潜力。那如何在数学作业批改中巧用评语,是值得我们认真思考的问题。
Tseng Kuo-fan said: “But hard work, do not ask harvest ”. How can we see the “work” of the students when correcting homework? Most of the teachers learn to judge the truth or not by using “√ ” “× ” when correcting homework, or use the percentile system. These two methods have a certain role in judging the correctness of the problems, evaluating the students’ academic performance and comparing the learning differences. However, it may seem tedious to use for a long time, and can not fully evaluate the basic quality and learning potential of a student. How to use comments in the math homework modification is a question that deserves our serious consideration.