“本土资源论”在中国曾引起极大的轰动,具有一种重要的“范式价值”。然而它的证成却存在严重的内在悖论:第一,理想与现实的纠葛不清;第二,法律多元与法律一元的层层矛盾;第三,本土资源与法律移植之间的徘徊犹豫;第四,对法律规避态度的是非反复。之所以存在这样的几个悖论,根源在于苏力的“本土资源论”是建基于实用主义的法律观以及法律理论家与实践家相结合的角色观之上的。“本土资源论”可能的完善之处在于,坚持法学研究的辩证思维的基础上,对法律、法学和法律适用以及法学理论与法律实践做必要的区分,并秉持对法律和法治向上向善的价值追求。 “The Theory of Local Resources” has caused great sensation in China and has an important “paradigm value.” However, there is a serious inherent paradox in its proof: first, the entanglement between ideal and reality is unclear; second, the multiple contradictions between legal pluralism and legal oneness; third, the hesitation between local resources and legal transplantation Fourth, non-repetition of attitudes toward law should be avoided. The reason why there are such several paradoxes lies in the fact that Su Li’s theory of “indigenous resources” is based on the view of pragmatism and the combination of legal theorists and practitioners. On the basis of the dialectical thinking of legal studies, it is possible to make the necessary distinction between the application of law, law and law as well as the theory of law and practice of law and uphold the principle of upholding the law and the rule of law Good value pursuit.