论文部分内容阅读
学界一般认为清绮斋初刻本王荆公诗李壁注源于元大德十年毋逢辰本,但这一论断存在缺陷:一,清绮斋初刻本中有部分注文非毋逢辰本所有;二,清绮斋本文字信息与毋逢辰本有较大差异;三,清绮斋本中的许多错字、缺字在毋逢辰本中是正确的,完整的。大德五年的王常本与毋逢辰本虽都为元刻本系统,但二者间有重要差异:1,毋本中存在许多王本中没有的李壁注;2,毋本文字信息与王本相差较大;3,毋本对王本有大量删节。此外,刘辰翁评点也存在诸多问题:一,大德本存在的评点在朝鲜活字本中大量缺失;二,刘辰翁评点被误作李壁注;三,朝鲜活字本中的评点,间有讹误,可用大德本校勘。
Scholars generally believe that the beginning of the Qing Dynasty Emperor Jingdian poem Li wall note originated in Yuan Dade ten years not every present, but this thesis is flawed: First, Qing Qi Zhai engraved in the beginning of this note, Second, the clear Qizai This text information and not present every time there is a big difference; three, Qing Qizai many of the typos, missing words in the not every book is correct and complete. There are two important differences between the two novels: Wang Chang-ben and Wu-bian Chen, both of which were in the early years of the Great De-dynasty. There are many differences between the two: 1) Larger; 3, without this there is a large number of king abridged. In addition, there are many problems in Liu Chenweng’s commentaries: First, there are a large number of shortcomings in Dadu’s commentaries on the living characters in North Korea; second, Liu Chenweng’s commentaries have been mistaken for Li Weizhi; thirdly, Dade this school survey.