论文部分内容阅读
柯林武德高度评价了基督教下的中世纪史学 ,但对其末世论给予了激烈批评。柯林武德的批评在理解大前提下并非无误 ,他要求内在于历史中理解过去 ,但又在现在基点上去理解过去 ,未来尚未实存则无法思想 ,由之反对末世论史学。末世论史学已经在近代影响了历史学的发展 ,而“未来”存在于历史中 ,影响着人们的生活 ,历史撰述需要关注人们对未来的预期。
Collingwood spoke highly of the medieval history under Christianity, but fiercely criticized his eschatology. Collingwood’s criticism was not without error in understanding the premise. He demanded that the inner understanding of the past in history, but at the present point to understand the past, the future has not yet survived can not think, from the end of eschatological history. Eschatology has historically affected the development of history in modern times. However, “future” exists in history and influences people’s life. Historical writing needs to pay attention to people’s expectation of the future.