论文部分内容阅读
自《再论白莲洞文化》一文发表以来,同期文化遗址的发掘与研究有了新的进展,其中特别值得关注的是湖南与江西的工作,前者为玉蟾岩(原称“蛤蟆洞”),后者为仙人洞与吊桶环。它们在研究过程中都与白莲洞文化系列框架进行了对照,得出各自的结论①②。然而,还有不少研究文章在引用有关白莲洞文化框架的资料时,却是采用了早期研究的结论③④,难免在对比研究上引起一些误失,甚为抱憾。因此,为了不致旧文献进一步误导学者,在本文陈述前,特将白莲洞文化系列新、旧
Since the publication of “Bailian Cave Culture,” a new progress has been made in the excavation and research of cultural relics in the same period. Among them, the work of Hunan and Jiangxi is of special concern, the former is Yucha Rock (formerly known as “Toad Cave ”), Which is immortal hole and bucket buckle ring. They are in the process of research and Bailian Cave series of cultural framework were compared to draw their conclusions ① ②. However, there are still many research articles which cite the data about Bailian Cave’s cultural framework but adopt the conclusion of the earlier study. (3) It is inevitable that some mistakes will be caused in comparative studies and it is very regrettable. Therefore, in order not to mislead the scholars further in the old literature, before presenting this article,