与其内斗,不如先同仇敌忾,与中国意义上的保守势力争辩。在法治实现以后,新左派和自由派在法治框架下,再去讨论是政府放任更好,还是政府干预以达社会公正更好。当初还在波士顿求学的时候,2000年前后,我遭遇了一位在哈佛燕京访问的中国的“自由主义”学者。在我对他的“自由主义”颇有微词之后,他迅速地给我贴了个标签,“你是个新左派!”我回应说,“不不不,我是个老右派”。这么说,一是调侃他的标签,二是因为,我自己倾向儒家的政治哲学,而我理解的儒家,在对平等的态度 Instead of fighting with them, it is better to first argue with enemies and with the conservative forces in the Chinese sense. After the realization of the rule of law, under the framework of the rule of law, the new leftists and liberals go on to discuss whether the government should be better laissez-faire or government intervention so as to achieve social fairness. When I was still studying in Boston, I met a Chinese “liberalist” scholar who visited Hong Kong at Harvard in 2000. He gave me a quick label after I was pretty critical of his liberalism. “You’re a new left!” I replied, “No, I’m an old rightist. ”. To put it this way, one is to ridicule his label, and the second is because I myself tend to Confucian political philosophy, and Confucianism I understand, in the attitude of equality