论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析非脱垂子宫经阴道全切除术与经腹全切除术的临床应用价值,探讨两种手术方式的特点。方法回顾性分析2009年～2011年3年间进行子宫切除术的患者80例,对其进行术中及术后的比较分析。结果两组手术患者皆成功,手术中及手术后无并发症,其中非脱垂子宫经阴道全切除术与经腹全切除术相比较,具有手术时间短、手术后短时间可下床走动和平均住院时间短等特点。结论非脱垂子宫经阴道全切除与经腹全切除两种手术相比较,前者具有患者子宫损伤小、手术后疼痛较轻、患者肠道功能恢复速度快、平均住院时间短、切口疤痕小以及患者术后恢复快等特点,具有临床应用意义及价值。
Objective To comparatively analyze the clinical value of total vaginal resection and transabdominal total resection of non-prolapsed uterus and discuss the characteristics of the two surgical methods. Methods A retrospective analysis of 80 cases of hysterectomy patients from 2009 to 2011 was carried out. The comparative analysis was performed during and after operation. Results The patients in both groups were successful in surgery and had no complications during or after operation. The total vaginal resection of non-prolapsed uterus compared with transabdominal total resection had shorter operative time, shorter ambulation and ambulation after ambulation Average length of stay and other characteristics. Conclusions Compared with transabdominal total resection, the former has the advantages of less uterus injury, less postoperative pain, faster recovery of intestinal function, shorter average length of stay, fewer incision scar and Patients recover quickly and so on, with clinical significance and value.