论文部分内容阅读
新中国成立以来的苏报案研究在人物研究方面一向注重中方人员,而忽略了对案件走向起决定性作用的列强方面人员。濮兰德是当时上海公租界工部局总办兼《泰晤士报》驻沪记者。本文在已有研究基础上,通过已出版史料、莫理循未刊日记及《泰》报当时的报道,揭示濮如何以总办身份“侵权最辣”及如何以“上海煽动案”系列报道领导苏报案舆论潮的史实。濮的双重身份使其在苏报案中成为一个表面隐秘实则重要的角色,这既是清末半殖民地半封建社会的特殊产物,也是清末驻华记者亲历与构建清末历史事件的一个缩影。
Since the founding of New China, the study of the Soviet newspaper has always paid attention to Chinese personnel in the study of figures, while neglecting the powers and powers of the strongmen who play a decisive role in the direction of the case. Puland was the head office of Shanghai Public-Concession Bureau and the Times reporter in Shanghai at the time. Based on the existing research, through the published diary and Morrison’s unpublished diary and the reports of “Thai” newspaper at the time, this article reveals how Pu is based on the status of “the most infringing infringer” and how to “incite the case of Shanghai” The series reports the historical facts of the tide of opinion wave of the leading Soviet newspaper. The double identity of Pu made it a secret and actually important part of the Soviet newspaper. This was a peculiar product of the semi-colonial and semi-feudal society in the late Qing Dynasty and a microcosm of the experience of the reporters in the late Qing Dynasty and the construction of historical events in the late Qing Dynasty.