论文部分内容阅读
本文通过科学计量学的方法,考察了石墨烯发现前后文献链条上的关键节点文献,对有关2010年诺贝尔物理学奖的争议进行了回答。研究结果表明,海姆、诺沃肖洛夫2004年发现石墨烯的文献以及发现石墨烯中的电子是具有无质量的狄拉克费米子两个成果具有很高的被引频次,也有很高的网络中介中心度值。他们获得诺贝尔奖是理所应当。另一方面,赫尔只有一篇2006年发表的文献处于链条之上,表明他在石墨烯发现之后对其性质的研究做出了实质性的贡献。凯姆则有两篇文献位于石墨烯发现前后的链条上,尤其是对石墨烯中存在肉眼可见的量子霍尔效应这一独特性质的发现,引发了大量相关研究。因此,海姆认为他也应当共同获奖是有相当理由的。
In this paper, by means of the method of scientometrics, the key nodes in the literature chain before and after the discovery of graphene were investigated, and the disputes about the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics were answered. The results of the study show that the results of the discovery of graphene by Heimn Novozolov in 2004 and the discovery that the electrons in graphene are digestible without quality are highly cited and also have high Network intermediary center value. They are Nobel Prize deserved. On the other hand, Hull has only one article published in 2006 on the chain, indicating that he made a substantial contribution to the study of its nature after the discovery of graphene. Kem has two articles on the chain before and after the discovery of graphene. In particular, the discovery of the unique property of the quantum Hall effect that is visible macroscopically in graphene has led to a large number of related studies. Therefore, Heim think he should win the co-there is a good reason.