论文部分内容阅读
按照平野龙一的观点,诉因是检察官指控的事实,诉因可以由检察官履行一定程序,在“公诉事实同一性”的范围内变更,法院没有变更诉因的权限和义务,即使命令检察官变更诉因,其命令也不具有形成新诉因的效力,但适用法律是法院的权力,法院可以在不改变诉因的前提下变更检察官指控的罪名。我国可借鉴日本诉因制度的经验,通过明确诉因,划清审判权在刑事诉讼中的界限,将审判权与公诉权区分开来,防止法院异化为追诉者,以保障被告人的权利,并实现公正、高效、权威等价值目标。在没有诉因制度的前提下,我国法院借鉴诉因变更主义的原理,也可以按照不同的情形对变更指控的问题分别作出处理。
According to Mr. Hirayuno, the cause of complaint is the fact that the prosecutor accused. The cause of complaint can be modified by the prosecutor to some extent within the scope of the “sameness of fact of public prosecution”. The court has no power or obligation to change the cause of action, Even if the prosecutor is ordered to change the cause of action, the order does not have the effect of forming a new cause of action. However, the applicable law is the power of the court and the court may alter the charges charged by the prosecutor without changing the cause of action. China can learn from the experience of Japan’s v. Vindication system, clarify the boundaries of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings by clarifying the causes of vindication, and separate the jurisdiction from the public prosecution to prevent courts from alienating themselves into prosecutors to protect the rights of defendants, And achieve fair, efficient, authoritative and other value goals. Without the cause of complaint system, our courts draw on the principle of v. V. Reformism and can also separately deal with the allegations of change according to different circumstances.