对学术论文的评价应从学科发展、学术价值、文献学价值等方面多角度、多方位地进行。针对目前我国学术论文评价体系存在的标准混乱、方法单一和缺乏权威性等问题 ,建议在现阶段应首先联合国内著名的期刊论文分析和评价单位及机构 ,对期刊论文采用统一建库、分工输入数据、集中研究和综合分析评价的方法。同时 ,在对学术论文的具体评价工作中还应注意将期刊论文分析研究成果与同行专家评议、科研管理专家的判断相结合 The evaluation of academic papers should be multidimensional and multidimensional from the aspects of subject development, academic value and documentary value. Aiming at the problems such as standard confusion, single method and lack of authority in the academic evaluation system in our country, it is suggested that at the present stage, we should first unite the famous units and institutions of journal articles analysis and evaluation in our country, Data, focus on research and comprehensive analysis and evaluation methods. At the same time, in the specific evaluation of academic papers should also pay attention to the analysis of the results of the journal papers and peer reviewers, experts combined with the judgment of management