论文部分内容阅读
作为“被丈夫气死的妻子”一安的审判长,现就安某的行为是否构成犯罪作以下评判: 一、从客观方面看:安某与陈某发生纠纷后,安某上班去了,陈某一跺脚坐在地上哭,邻居将陈抬至屋内,不一会陈发生休克,经医院抢救,于当日死亡。经法医鉴定陈某系“胸腺淋巴体质”病发死亡。此病症发展到一定程度,可因惊吓、轻击、情绪、激动、生气等诱因导致休克死亡。可见,陈某死亡的直接原因是“胸腺淋巴体质”。此前,安某并不知道陈某患有如此“小气”的病症。这一结论是陈某死亡后经法医鉴定才明了的事实。这已充分说明,陈某是由于本身生理上存在特殊条件才导致死亡结果的发生。安某、陈某夫妻间的吵打纠纷,其结果只会对夫妻感情造成影响。安某的行为打陈某一耳光,只能够使陈某脸部痛苦,并不会损害陈某身体健康及生命。安某的行为,并非因过失而导致陈某死亡的行为,也非危害社会的行为,当然也就谈不上危害社会的结果。所以,陈某之死与安某之行为
As the presiding judge of “Annoyed by Husband,” I now judge whether An’s behavior constitutes a crime: First, from an objective perspective: After An and Chen confront each other, Ann went to work, Chen lay on the floor stomping cry, neighbors Chen carried to the house, a sudden Chen shock occurred, the hospital was rescued, died on the same day. After the forensic identification of Chen Department of “thymus lymphatic constitution” death. The disease developed to a certain extent, may be due to shock, flick, emotion, excitement, angry and other incentives lead to shock death. Visible, the direct cause of Chen death is “thymus lymphatic constitution.” Previously, Ann did not know that Chen has such “stingy” illness. This conclusion is the death of Chen after the forensic identification of the fact that. This fully shows that Chen is due to its own physiological conditions that have led to the death of special occurrences. A certain, Chan disputes between husband and wife disputes, the result will only affect the feelings of the couple. A certain act of playing Chen a slap in the face, can only make Chen face pain, and will not damage Chen’s health and life. Any behavior, not because of negligence led to Chen’s death, nor is it harmful to society, of course, will not be able to endanger the outcome of the community. So, Chen’s death and security behavior