论文部分内容阅读
当我们透过诸多流派的学说及其间的争论来考察法律的性质问题时,便发现该问题至少分为三个相互有别而又相互关联的问题。这三个议题涉及法律渊源、法律目的和法律适用,在法律适用中又包括有关我们实际上和能够使法律有效的方法问题。可被称为哲学性的法律探讨中所牵涉的各种问题,似乎是由于需要拥有某些能被用来证成和/或批评现存法律规则和法律实践的原则。这一需要和动机或许在如下哲学中得到最清晰的彰显,那些哲学在它们所谓的实在法和自然法之间做出明确区分,并且把自然法作为实在法应当实现之目的与应该符合之标准。当下,
When we look at the nature of law through the doctrines of various schools of thought and the arguments in between, we find that the problem is divided into at least three separate and inter-related issues. These three topics deal with the sources of law, the purpose of the law and the application of the law. In the application of the law, we also include questions about the methodologies we actually and can make the law effective. The problems involved in philosophical legal inquiry appear to be due to the need to have certain principles that can be used to justify and / or criticize existing legal and legal practices. This need and motivation may be most clearly demonstrated in the philosophies that make a clear distinction between what they call real law and natural law and regard natural law as the goal and the standard that real law should fulfill. Now,