在不同国策的影响下 ,两汉的经学在政治、社会生活中呈现不同的功能。西汉“经学”以饰政为主 ,所谓为汉代建制 ,润色鸿业 ;东汉“经学”则以修身为主 ,所谓因心会道 ,教化世风。因此 ,西汉的“经学士人”以官为本位 ,形成工具化人格 (功名人格 ) ,不仅在思想、学术 ,乃至文学方面都有很强的功利色彩 ,汉大赋就是在这样的文化氛围中产生 ,其对象、内容及功能都与“官”本位的工具化功利色彩相得益彰。东汉“经学士人”以德为本位 ,以“师”为身份 ,形成“自主化”人格 (道德人格 )。由于官与师的疏离 ,逐渐产生政与德的对抗 ,造成士人深刻的心理悲剧 ,故而诗产生而赋消亡。“官吏”、“师长”和“诗人”三位一体是传统士人身份的主要特征 ,两汉社会是这个身份模式形成的重要阶段 ,也是传统文化 (本文主要涉及文学 )模式形成的重要历史时期 Under the influence of different national policies, the study of Confucian classics in Han Dynasty presented different functions in politics and social life. The Western Han Dynasty “by the school” mainly to decorative politics, the so-called Han Dynasty system, polish Hongye; the Eastern Han “classics” is to cultivate the main, the so-called because of the heart to teach the world. Therefore, the “Scholar” of the Western Han Dynasty took the official as the standard and formed the instrumental personality (fame and genius), which not only has strong utilitarian color in ideology, academia and literature, but Han Tai Fu is in such a cultural atmosphere Produced, its objects, contents and functions all complement the instrumental utilitarian colors of “official” standard. The Eastern Han Dynasty “scholar” to Germany as the standard, “teacher” as the identity, the formation of “independent” personality (moral personality). Due to the alienation of officials and teachers, the political and moral confrontation gradually arises, which leads to the profound psychological tragedy of intellectuals. The “officials”, “teachers” and “poets” Trinity are the main characteristics of the traditional identity of scholars, Han society is an important stage in the formation of this identity model, but also the traditional culture (this article is mainly related to literature) model formed during the important historical period