论文部分内容阅读
面对今天汉语学界的基督教研究,我们更需要强调神学的而不只是其他世俗科学的角度。在本人的新约研究中,我主要使用历史逻辑的研究方法,即从新约文本内含的语言观、时间观、正义观、信仰观四个方面展开诠释。这里,我们可以从此观察汉语学界三十年来的新约研究,其特征为:从圣经的语言、时间观念、社会正义方面切入者较少,大多选择基督论的、跨文化的比较视角;基督论的视角,主要是从历史学、神哲学而不是神学传统中的角度,仅关涉历史上的耶稣问题。跨文化的比较视域,限于希伯来、希腊、基督教、汉语思想的典籍与传统,关系到上帝论、基督论、圣灵论、人观、伦理观几个大的方面;从它所涉及的对象看,对观福音、路加神学、普通书信、《启示录》基本上无人问津。它在宏观上由于学者们没有建立独特的系统神学,因而在具体研究时很难有深度的文本与神学阐释;在微观层面,由于普遍对圣经经文的细读体会不够,因而很少见到独特的文本与神学阐释。至于与实践处境结合方面,就更显得停留于表层。因此,汉语学界的圣经新约研究,应当从语言文本经典、神学理解传统、当代处境实践三个方面推进。不过,美国西北大学的华人学者杨克勤博士从诠释学传统发展出新约跨文化修辞诠释学,值得学界注意。
In the face of the Christian studies in the Chinese language today, we need to emphasize theology rather than just other secular sciences. In my study of the New Testament, I mainly use the research method of historical logic, that is, interpretation from the aspects of language concept, time concept, concept of justice and belief in New Testament text. From here, we can observe the study of the New Testament in the Chinese academic field over the past 30 years. The characteristics of the study are as follows: there are few cutters from the aspects of biblical language, time concept and social justice, most choose the comparatively cross-cultural perspective of Christianity; From the perspectives of history, divine philosophy rather than theological tradition, it deals only with the issue of Jesus in history. The cross-cultural comparative horizon is limited to the books and traditions of Hebrew, Greek, Christian, and Chinese thinking and concerns several major aspects of God’s theory, the theory of Christ, the theory of the Holy Spirit, human outlook, and ethics; The object of view, the concept of the Gospel, Luke theology, ordinary letters, “Apocalypse” basically nobody cares. At a macroscopic level, because scholars have not established a unique systematic theology, it is very difficult to have deep textual and theological interpretations in specific studies; at the micro level, it is seldom seen as a result of widespread lack of understanding of Scripture verses Unique texts and theological interpretations. As for the combination with the practical situation, it seems even more to stay on the surface. Therefore, the study of the New Testament of the Bible in the Chinese academic field should be promoted from three aspects: language and scriptural classic, theological understanding of tradition, and contemporary situation and practice. However, Dr. Han Keqin, a Chinese scholar at Northwestern University in the United States, has developed from the perspective of hermeneutic tradition the transattic rhetorical hermeneutics of the New Testament.