本文试图以文派论争为切入点,理顺桐城派与扬州学派的不同价值指向。桐城派与骈文派的错位之争其实是晚清以来宋、汉之争的反映。后期汉学扬州学派崛起,而宋学不甘落魄而公开挑战。扬州学派殿军刘师培不仅继承汉学权威从学术理论上对宋学予以攻击,而且力图从文本体裁上否认桐城文派作文之法,揭穿其官方代言体的面目,从而彻底击溃桐城派。文学样式背后都反映了各自的价值考虑。 This article tries to take the literary argument as a breakthrough point, straighten out the different values ​​of Tongcheng school and Yangzhou school. The dislocation between the Tongcheng school and the vernacular school is actually a reflection of the dispute between the Song and Han since the late Qing dynasty. Later Yangzhou School of Sinology rise, while Song learning unveiling and open challenge. The Yangzhou School’s Diannian Liu Shipei not only inherited the authority of sinology, attacked Song Studies from academic theory, but also attempted to deny Tongcheng School’s style of writing from the genre of text and expose the face of its official representative body to completely defeat the Tongcheng School. Behind the literary style reflects their own value considerations.