论文部分内容阅读
为了探讨中晚期原发性肝癌不同介入治疗方法的疗效，估价ＴＡＥ后Ⅱ期切除的价值。笔者对１００例无手术指征的中晚期肝癌进行不同方法的介入治疗，随机分成Ａ、Ｂ、Ｃ、三组，对各组治疗前后的临床症状、ＡＦＰ、肿块缩小率及生存率、平均生存期进行分析比较。结果：ＴＡＥ后Ⅱ期切除组疗效明显高于单纯ＴＡＥ及ＴＡＩ组，ＴＡＩ组最差。结论，ＴＡＥ后Ⅱ期切除是治疗中晚期肝癌极有希望的方法，值得推广，病例及时机的选择是提高Ⅱ切除疗效的关键。
In order to investigate the efficacy of different interventional treatment methods for advanced primary liver cancer, the value of secondary resection after TAE evaluation. The author of the 100 patients with no indication for advanced middle and advanced liver cancer interventional treatment of different methods, were randomly divided into A, B, C, three groups, before and after treatment of each group of clinical symptoms, AFP, tumor reduction rate and survival rate, the average survival Analysis and comparison. Results: The efficacy of TAE after secondary resection was significantly higher than that of TAE and TAI alone. The TAI group was the worst. Conclusion: The secondary resection of TAE after TAE is a very promising method for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. It is worthy of promotion. The choice of timing and timing is the key to improve the efficacy of II resection.