论文部分内容阅读
文章概括了目前存在的四种同行评议形式(单盲评审、双盲评审、公开评审和发表后评审)在学术出版过程中的作用、发展现状和存在的问题。调研并分析了一些国际出版机构、作者、审稿人、期刊编辑对同行评议形式的态度。指出目前研究人员所关心的问题仍然偏重于符合科学习惯的常规评审形式(单盲或双盲评审),然而在网络环境下的学术交流新模式中,公开评审可能使同行评议真正对科学研究过程有所贡献。但目前公开评审仍处于试验阶段,改变现有的论文评审程序或习惯,将是科学出版领域的一项长期工程。
The article summarizes the current role of the four peer review forms (single-blind review, double-blind review, public review and post-evaluation) in academic publishing process, the status quo and existing problems. Investigate and analyze the attitude of some international publishers, authors, reviewers and periodical editors on the form of peer review. Pointing out that the current researchers are still concerned about the issue of conventional accreditation (single-blind or double-blind accreditation) that accords with scientific habits. However, in the new mode of academic exchange under the network environment, public review may make the peer review seriously affect the scientific research process Contribute. However, at present, the public review and assessment is still in the experimental stage. Changing the existing paper review procedures or habits will be a long-term project in the field of scientific publishing.