读《阳明学刊》第一辑《孔子“幽赞而达乎数,明数而达乎德”含义考释——兼论孔子的易学方法论》一文,费尽思考不得其要,可能是我们个体对古圣人孔子的原意在理解上存在差异所致。文中把古圣人的教诲理解为易学方法论,似乎有些牵强,至于离原文之意有多远,我们还是一起前往分析一下就知道了。首先,我们先看一下原文之引言:帛书《周易·易之义》第四章有这样一段话:“昔者圣人之作易也,幽赞于神明而生占也,参天雨地而义数也,观变于阴阳而立卦也,发 Reading Yang Meijue’s first series, ”Confucius“, ”Youzan and Dahuo, Mingyu and Da-de“ Interpretation - Also on Confucius’s ”Methodology of Yi-ology“ It is caused by the differences in our understanding of the original meaning of Confucius of the ancient sages. The text of the teachings of the ancient sages as easy to learn methodology, it seems that some far-fetched, as far as the meaning of the original text, we still go together to analyze the know. First of all, let us first look at the introduction of the original text: Silk book ”Yi Yi Yi Yi“ Chapter IV has this passage: ”Sage who made the past also easy to praise, Number also, the concept of change in the yin and yang also Gua, hair