论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,史学界对井冈山时期的革命斗争史用力甚勤,成果颇丰。但也有不少问题需作进一步探讨,比如,彭德怀率领红五军下山是继红四军主力出发赣南之后的又一次“战略引退”,而不是标明井冈山保卫战的失败,更不是“弃守逃跑”;“围魏救赵”是“柏露会议”最后决策的,但此前已经多次提出,此后又召开过一系列重要会议加以贯彻落实;“围魏救赵”决策有得也有失,即在战略上是积极的、主动的,在战术上又是不完全可取的。
For a long time, historians have been working hard on the history of the revolutionary struggle in Jinggangshan and have achieved fruitful results. For example, Peng Dehuai led the Red Army downhill after another departure of the “Red Army” from the main force of the Red Army’s departure to southern Jiangxi, instead of marking the defeat of the Battle of Jinggangshan and not “abandoning Escape ”;“ Wei Wei Zhao ”is the“ Bo Lu Conference ”the final decision, but has been made several times before, and then held a series of important meetings to be implemented;“ Weijiu save Zhao ”decision-making have both gains and losses, that is strategically positive Active, tactical is not entirely desirable.