论文部分内容阅读
本文对希利斯·米勒“文学终结论”的语境进行了考察,认为他不是在后现代语境中而是在科学语境中来阐释这个命题的。在米勒看来,工业革命时期的科学技术培育了主客二分的分析思维,划清了文学与非文学的边界,为“文学”观念诞生提供了契机;而信息科学技术转向了整体性、综合性思维,这种哲学思维的重大变革,使得文学与非文学的边界消失了,信息时代的到来则宣告了文学的“终结”。米勒的论述强化了科学技术的意识形态功能,力图从马克思主义唯物主义理论中寻求依据。
This article examines the context of Sir Milis Miller’s The End of Literary Theory, arguing that he does not interpret this proposition in the context of science, not in postmodern contexts. In Miller’s view, science and technology during the industrial revolution fostered an analytical approach that dominates the subject and object, clarified the boundaries between literature and non-literature, and provided an opportunity for the birth of the concept of “literature.” The information science and technology turned to integrity , Comprehensive thinking, major changes in this philosophical thinking, the border between literature and non-literary disappeared, the advent of the information age proclaimed the literary “end ”. Miller’s argument strengthens the ideological function of science and technology and seeks evidence from the Marxist materialist theory.