一、引言商业方法专利源於美国,随着高科技和经济的发展,逐渐被午多国家的专利制度所接受和保护,但世界各国的可专利性判断标准却存在很大差异,即便在美国,法律界、学术界封商业方法的可专利性的争论也是持续不断。2010年6月28日,美国联邦最高法院以5∶4的微弱优势,封备受瞩目的Bilski v.Kappos一案作出了判决,主要观点如下: I. INTRODUCTION Commercial method patents originate from the United States. With the development of high technology and economy, they are gradually accepted and protected by the patent system of more countries in the world. However, the standards of patentability in various countries in the world are quite different. Even in the United States There is also a constant debate over the patentability of the business community in the legal and academic circles. On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States made the verdict with a 5: 4 margin of weakness in the spotlight of Bilski v. Kappos. The main points are as follows: