“调解代替判决”现象在我国执行“调解优先”的司法原则中十分普遍,具有一定的现实和理性。但从法理学角度来说,以调解代替判决也容易出现问题,例如当判不判、以调代判等,在司法实践中产生一些负面作用。本文结合法理学角度展开研究,针对这一现象展开分析,并探究克服调解代替判决中负面影响的途径。 The “mediation instead of judgments” phenomenon is quite common in the judicial principles for the implementation of “mediation priority” in our country and has certain reality and rationality. However, from a jurisprudence point of view, mediation instead of judgments is also prone to problems, such as when judgments are not adjudicated and adjudicative adjusters have some negative effects in judicial practice. This article starts from the angle of jurisprudence, analyzes the phenomenon and explores ways to overcome the negative influence of mediation instead of judgments.