论文部分内容阅读
对1930年代江西省域内的国、共干训进行探讨,对于解剖1930年代的江西,深化苏区史和民国史的研究具有重要意义。共产党方面的干训主要实践于1930年代上半期,包括学校训练、在职训练和实践锻炼,形成以实践锻炼为主,学校训练和在职训练为重要方式的干训格局。国民党方面的干训主要包括蒋介石和中央军事委员会主导的庐山军官训练团以及江西省政府主导的县政研究会、县政训练所和地方政治讲习院等。国、共双方的干训,从渊源来看同源但分流,从目标来看对立但一致,从方式来看小同但大异。由于干训指导思想、方式方法、党组织严密程度、党风党纪与干部任用政策等因素的不同,使得国民党的干训虽正规但实际效果有限,共产党的干训虽规模小、规范性较差但掌握了干训的真谛,效果较为明显。
It is of great significance to conduct an analysis of the training of all the countries and regions in Jiangxi Province in the 1930s for the purpose of dissecting the 1930s in Jiangxi and deepening the study of the history of the Soviet Area and the Republic of China. The mainstay of the Communist Party’s practice of training was mainly in the first half of the 1930s, including school training, on-the-job training and practical training, forming a cadre training pattern that focused on practical training, school training and on-the-job training. The KMT training mainly includes the Lushan military training corps led by Chiang Kai-shek and the Central Military Commission, the county government-led research institute under the leadership of the Jiangxi Provincial Government, the county training center and local political lectures. Countries, a total of both sides of the dry training, from the origin of the same source but the diversion, from the opposite point of view, but the same point of view, from the perspective of the same method. Due to the different guiding ideology, methods and methods, the strictness of party organizations, party discipline and the cadre appointment policy, the training of the Kuomintang has a formal but limited practical effect. Although the training of the Communist Party is small in scale and less normative But mastered the essence of dry training, the effect is more obvious.