论文部分内容阅读
本文通过探讨“规范宪法学”和“政治宪法学”之争,尤其是对于两种版本的政治宪政主义的检讨,以揭示隐藏在其背后的基本逻辑。本文将首先探讨政治自主性这一现代政治生活的核心要素,并在此基础之上检视高全喜式的政治宪政主义的限度。其次,本文将探讨作为人类意志之表达机制的法秩序的性质,并以此修正陈端洪式的政治宪政主义。最后,本文将通过重新阐发古典国家观念以便提出一种国家德性理论,从而将国家德性作为“驯化”那个会随时不受自身设定之约束机制所约束的“政治”。进而阐明法秩序与德性作为国家之自我约束的两种不可或缺的机制,而这正是一种康德式的政治宪政主义,亦即一种自我立法式的政治宪政主义的基本旨趣。
This article explores the debate between “regulating constitutional law” and “political constitutional law,” especially the review of the two versions of political constitutionalism in order to reveal the underlying logic behind it. This article will first explore the core elements of political autonomy as a modern political life and, on this basis, examine the limits of a highly all-embracing political constitutionalism. Second, this article will explore the nature of the legal order as a mechanism of expression of the will of mankind, and to correct Chen Duanhong’s political constitutionalism. In the end, this paper will re-analyze the concept of the classical country in order to propose a theory of national morality, and thus regard the morality of the country as the “political ” that is “domestication ” that will not be subject to its own constraints at any time. And then clarify the legal order and virtue as two indispensable mechanisms for the self-restraint of the state. This is precisely Kantian political constitutionalism, that is, the basic purpose of a self-legislative political constitutionalism.