论文部分内容阅读
分析了由于审稿时间仓促、委托审稿机制的不完善、缺乏监督约束机制、专家权益保障机制不健全等原因,造成部分专家审稿不充分、不严谨,审稿意见的可用性、可参考性不强,评判结果客观性、公正性缺失,学术尺度把握不准等情况,从创造有利于专家审稿的环境、建立健全审稿工作的检查监督机制、建立编辑部-审稿专家的互动交流机制等方面提出了解决这些问题的措施。
The paper analyzes the reasons of some shortcomings, such as the shortage of reviewers, the imperfect mechanism of commission reviewers, the lack of supervision and restraint mechanism, the imperfect mechanism of safeguarding the rights and interests of experts, Weakness, objectivity of judgments, lack of impartiality and uncertainty of academic standards. From creating an environment conducive to expert review, establishing a sound inspection and supervision mechanism for reviewing manuscripts and establishing an interactive exchange between editorial departments and reviewers Mechanisms and other aspects put forward measures to solve these problems.