论文部分内容阅读
十多年前,筆者寫過一篇小文,討論竹簡《文子·聖知》章的復原等問題。1最近讀到譚寶剛先生一篇文章,提出了新的該章復原方案,並批評拙文的“復原可商榷之處有三”:第一,没有考慮到2465簡和0909簡這兩支關鍵簡的歸屬。要復原簡文“聖知”章,2465簡和0909簡是不可忽視的。以内容言,2465簡和0909簡不但屬於“聖知”章,而且是“聖知”章的開頭部分。
More than a decade ago, I wrote a small essay on the restoration of the Chapter of the Bamboo Slips. 1 recently read an article by Mr. Tan Baogang and proposed a new plan for the restoration of the chapter and criticized the article “There are three aspects for the restoration of the question:” First, the two key pieces, namely, 2465 and 0909, were not taken into consideration Attribution. To restore the simple article “Sage ” chapter, 2465 Jane and 0909 Jane can not be ignored. By content, 2465 and 0909 Jane belong not only to the Saints but also to the beginning of the Saints.