评选优秀文章,编辑部是第一次。除了本刊记者(特约除外)采写的文章不参加评选之外,这次评选并未邀请专家学者,也没有群众投票,这也是一个尝试。充分体现编辑部意愿的评选或许对读者、作者了解编辑们选发文章的取向有帮助。评选的形式虽然简单,但丝毫不随便。因为某篇文章能否入选,编辑们照样“争吵”。其实大家都清楚,文无定论,很难绝对地说哪一篇文章就是美仑美奂,毫无瑕疵。但我们也掌握了这样一点。即文章“无一定之律,而有一定之妙”。评选出的文章,或道出了以往研究中的谬误,有学术上的突破,象《千文架阁法非千丈架阁法》;或者针贬时弊, Selected excellent articles, the editorial department is the first time. In addition to articles (except for special) written articles do not participate in the selection, the selection did not invite experts and scholars, there is no mass vote, this is also an attempt. It may be helpful for readers and authors to understand the editors ’selection of essays to fully reflect the editors’ wishes. Although the selection of the form is simple, but not casually. Because an article can be selected, editors are still “quarrel.” In fact, we all know that there is no final conclusion. It is hard to say exactly which article is a beautiful and flawless one. But we have mastered this as well. The article “no certain law, but there is a certain wonderful.” Selected articles, or out of the fallacies in previous studies, there are academic breakthroughs, such as “a few a thousand years of cabinet law non-trumpet shelf law”; or pinpoint the disadvantages,