论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨分析哮喘应用酮替芬治疗的临床效果。方法:回顾我院57例哮喘病治疗者资料,其中常规治疗20例为对照组,常规治疗加酮替芬治疗37例为观察组。对比两组临床疗效及不良反应、并发症情况。结果:观察组临床疗效明显优于对照组,差异明显(P<0.05),并发症及不良反应发生率与对照组相比无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:对哮喘病患者在常规治疗基础上给予酮替芬治疗,有利于提高哮喘病临床疗效,安全性更高,可广泛应用于临床。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of ketotifen treatment for asthma. Methods: The data of 57 asthmatic patients in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 20 cases were routinely treated with ketamine and 37 cases were treated with ketotifen. Compare the two groups of clinical efficacy and adverse reactions, complications. Results: The clinical curative effect in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications and adverse reactions between the observation group and the control group (P> 0.05). Conclusions: The treatment of asthma patients with ketotifen on the basis of routine treatment is conducive to improve the clinical efficacy of asthma, higher safety, and can be widely used in clinical.